“We used to get some fresh Japanese fish, but due to customs bans we stopped receiving them two months ago,” Wang said, referencing the import controls imposed last month.
Wang showed AFP frozen Japanese seafood products that he will be unable to restock once sold — if customers are still interested.
“There’s a large gap in our sales volume compared with before. In the past, such as during the pandemic, we had to kill three to five tuna every week,” Wang said.
“Now we kill very few fish, and they are not from Japan, but from Australia, New Zealand and Spain.”
The 53-year-old said the quality of these products is “very poor, and not comparable to that of Japan.”
But in the face of “great resistance” from the public to Japanese products, he said he has little choice.
“This pollution topic is being closely followed.”
The release plan has been endorsed by the International Atomic Energy Agency — the United Nation’s nuclear watchdog — which said it meets international standards and “will not cause any harm to the environment.”
And the overriding consensus among international experts is that the operation is safe.
But shortly after the discharge of wastewater began on Thursday, China said it would suspend the import of all Japanese aquatic products.
Elsewhere in the Beijing market, workers said the impact of the water release plan had been significant.
Many recently stopped selling all seafood from Japan.
“The plan to release the water is causing trouble for Japan and all other countries,” said Huang Xiaohao, the boss of a store advertising imported products.
“If you look around at what we’re selling, you’ll find that most of these things are actually domestic products,” he said.
Pressure has come both from official customs restrictions, others said, as well as from consumers who worry about the impact of Japanese seafood products on their health.
One merchant who declined to be named told AFP that tuna from places other than Japan — where he usually sourced products — are simply not as good.
AFP
