The Senator representing Delta South Senatorial District, Joel-Onowakpo Thomas, has sought the National and State House of Assembly Election Petition Tribunal to release the Certified True Copy of the judgment on the petition filed against him.
Thomas who was recently sacked by a tribunal panel sitting in Asaba, Delta also appealed to the President of the Appellate Court to intervene.
His appeal was contained in a petition to the President of the Court of Appeal, Nigeria, signed by his Counsel, Robert Emukpoeruo SAN, of Summit Law Chambers, Solicitors & Advocates, copies of which were made available to journalists in Warri on Sunday.
The petition was aptly titled “Non-release of Judgement Delivered on September 6, 2023 in Petition No: EPT/DL/SEN/01/2023 – Diden Michael & ANOR v INEC & ORS.”
It would be recalled that the National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Asaba had ordered a rerun election in Warri South Local Government Area which, according to the judgement, should be held within 90 days.
Senator Joel-Onowakpo said he has not come to terms with why the Chairman of the tribunal is not forthcoming with the Certified True Copy of the judgement adding that the non-release of the CTC is impeding his determination to challenge the ruling in an appeal, as he was not satisfied with the verdict of the tribunal.
The petition read partly, “We act as Counsel for Senator Joel-Onowakpo Thomas Ewomazino, the 2nd Respondent in the above petition and we have his instructions to bring to your Lordship’s attention the failure to release upon application the judgement of the National and State Houses of Assembly Election Tribunal Panel 3 sitting in Asaba in the aforesaid matter.
“On September 6, 2023, the National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly Election Tribunal, Holden in Asaba (Panel 3) delivered judgement in the above petition in which it ordered a rerun of the Delta South Senatorial District Election.
“We immediately applied for the Certified True Copy of the said judgement with a view to our client preparing and filing his notice and grounds appeal against the judgement.
“A copy of the duly acknowledged letter is herewith attached showing that our application was received on September 7, 2023.”
“Since the day of delivery of the judgement we have embarked on a daily pilgrimage to the Registrar of the Tribunal for the Certified True Copy of the judgement only to be met by the blunt statement of the Tribunal’s Secretary that the Chairman of the Tribunal has not yet released the judgement!
“Today, the 11th day of September 2023, makes it the sixth day out of the constitutionally limited period of the sixty (60) days from the delivery of the judgement for the Court of Appeal to hear and determine our client’s appeal pursuant to the provisions of Section 285(7) of the 1999 Constitution and our client still does not have the judgement!
“In order that our client’s constitutionally guaranteed right of appeal is not truncated entirely and the Court of Appeal itself is not placed under an intolerable time constrain to hear and determine our proposed appeal we most humbly appeal to your noble Lord to prevail on or and direct the Chairman of the Tribunal aforesaid to immediately release the judgment delivered in the aforesaid matter.”
